Penelitian ini menganalisis strategi kesantunan yang digunakan oleh petugas polisi saat memberikan tilang dan faktor-faktor mempengaruhi kantor polisi untuk menggunakan strategi kesantunan. Data yang ucapan polisi 'yang terdiri dari strategi kesantunan. Data dianalisis dan diklasifikasikan berdasarkan teori yang diusulkan oleh Brown dan Levinson. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain deskriptif kualitatif. Sumber data beberapa video on Cops TV Show, sedangkan data adalah ucapan polisi yang mengandung strategi kesantunan. Metode yang digunakan dalam pengumpulan data adalah metode non observasi partisipan, sedangkan metode analisis data adalah metode korelasi lingual ekstra. Setelah melakukan analisis, penulis menemukan bahwa ada lima jenis strategi kesantunan yang digunakan; off record (6 data), pada catatan terus terang (10 data), kesopanan positif (4 data) dan kesopanan negatif (20 data) dan catatan dengan tindakan redressive (data 3). Diasumsikan bahwa kekuasaan relatif dipengaruhi ucapan perwira polisi. Dari temuan, beberapa saran untuk peneliti selanjutnya diberikan; itu menyarankan bahwa mereka dapat melakukan penelitian serupa dalam lingkup yang berbeda dan keterbatasan.

This study analyzed the politeness strategies which were used by police officers when giving traffic ticket and the factors influenced the police offices to use politeness strategies. The data were the police officers’ utterances that consisted of politeness strategies. The data were analyzed and classified based on theory which was proposed by Brown and Levinson. The study used descriptive qualitative design. The sources of data were some videos of on Cops TV Show, while the data were the utterances of police officers containing politeness strategies. The method used in collecting data was non participant observation method, while the method of analyzing data was the extra lingual correlation method. After doing the analysis, the writer found that there were five kinds of politeness strategies used; off record (6 data), on record baldly (10 data), positive politeness (4 data) and negative politeness (20 data) and on record with redressive action (3 data). It was assumed that relative power influenced police officer’s utterances. From the findings, some suggestions for further researchers were provided; it was suggested that they can conduct similar studies in different scope and limitation.

Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal Baca Jurnal